Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dbiv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dbiv[edit]

final (14/0/1) ending 01:08 20 January 2005 (UTC)

I've been here since the end of March 2004, and have just gone over 2,000 edits (about three quarters to the main namespace). I have been doing some new article patrolling recently and been involved in some VfD process checking (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Boris Johnson). Dbiv 01:14, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Gzornenplatz 01:41, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Carrp 03:30, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. Strong support. 172 21:21, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support. Quite a prolific writer, has contributed a slew of articles. ----MPerel( talk | contrib) 21:40, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Lst27 (talk) 22:38, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. Whilst his support for the Labour party brings his judgment into question, I still support, jguk 00:10, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  7. Mackensen (talk) 05:18, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. john k 01:28, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Michael Snow 07:06, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. Proteus (Talk) 23:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support. Level headed and contributes a lot of material. - Taxman 00:14, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support. Seems OK. A few good admins have voted for him, so that's a plus. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:18, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  13. Johnleemk | Talk 17:25, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  14. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:11, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Seems OK, but I have never seen this user. Jordi· 09:09, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments

  • Dbiv currently has 2014 edits, with his first at 00:14 on March 27 2004. His talk page has 40 edits since inception, which implies that he's never been in a big dispute. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 02:01, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I often patrol Special:Newpages for speedy deletion material and keep a check on current VfD debates. As I regularly check UK politics articles which are sometimes the targets of vandalism, I will also look out for this more intensively.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. A list of major contributions is on my user page. Obviously I'm quite proud of the featured articles which I have been involved in, and also of contributing biographies of London political figures.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. I haven't been involved in any editing wars, which must be partly because if there's a dispute about an edit my normal reaction is to become calmer and go to talk pages to explain why I prefer my version, and try to hash out a solution. See Talk:Tony Blair for some examples.