Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacilos

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 14:52, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bacilos[edit]

Short, very little context, no indication of notability. -- Curps 02:30, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Delete Advertisment, instruction manual (all it does is instruct peole how to find more information). -- User:NoPetrol
Keep. Clicking in "What links here", we see they won a Grammy Award in 2003. bacilos + latin gets 10,000 Google hits. I've expanded the article with the information I could found. JoaoRicardo 03:20, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep Good digging JoaoRicardo. Is the original author still around or anyone else who wants a crack at adding some usefull additional edits?Weaponofmassinstruction 05:09, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, article does not establish notability, looks like a band advertisement/vanity. Megan1967 05:20, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep and cleanup. Even if they hadn't won a Grammy, three albums is notable enough. We have articles on bands that are less notable. Rick K 05:47, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, article clearly establishes notability and has been cleaned up. Expand it next. Samaritan 05:56, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. As well as the Grammy, their debut album was nominated for a Latin Grammy and they have had an album and singles make the Billboard Latin charts. Clearly notable within genre. Capitalistroadster 07:52, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Have added info to the article. This band has had number one singles in Chile and Argentina, won Latin Grammies and their 2004 album Sin Verguenza has again been nominated for Best Latin Album in the Grammy awards of 2005. 1. I have added info to the article. No change from Keep.Capitalistroadster 09:22, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Bad VfD, there is plenty here which establishes notability. GRider\^talk 22:48, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I certainly agree that this is a keeper, but calling this a bad VfD is unwarranted. The article's entire contents at the time of nomination were "Bacilos is a latin group. If you want information about it, go to www.bacilos.com", which is hovering just on this side of a speedy as "consists solely of an external link", and well on the other side of a speedy as "very short article with little or no context". —Korath (Talk) 13:01, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Even at its original state, I wouldn't have listed it at VfD, but asked for cleanup (like what happened to the article about Daddy Yankee in its first day). --Fibonacci 00:38, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It has been cleaned up nicely. Da 'Sco Mon 01:23, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, meets WikiProject:Music's [[guidelines for inclusion. Tuf-Kat 16:19, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.