User talk:Topbanana/Reports/This page contains a link that might be misspelled

For links which are determined to be not misspelled ("Different person") should we be crossing them out, or not crossing them out? I'm also curious, if this report is run in the future, is there going to be a clever way to cull the entries which have been deemed correct in a previous pass? Boojum 14:07, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This report only lists links to articles which do not exist. Either the link is incorrect or we're missing an article - fixing either will ensure the item doesn't appear on the list when I recreate it. If there's a large amount of useful annotation still on the list at that time I'll have a look at retaining some or all of it. - TB 14:30, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)

I've inserted stubs in some cases, but it seems unaesthetic in the case of a long list of names, none of whom have their own entry. Though I suppose that they have links suggests they should all get stubs and I should get over my aesthetic qualms. Boojum 17:07, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yup, I agree, it's a difficult call to make in some cases. If I really and truly can't imagine anyone - and there are people with a very, shall we say, dedicated attitude to niche subjects around here - possibly being able to write more than a stub on the topic I'll remove the link. Otherwise, the 'what links here' option somtimes presents at least enough info for a line or two of stub. - TB 22:07, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)