Talk:Battle of Killdeer Mountain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Language[edit]

The original text of this article is at Killdeer Mountain at the National Park Service and is in the public domain. DialUp 05:03, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think this text merits some consideration of the perspective and language used here.

The first thing is that the US Army sought "to end the war with the Sioux". While it might be argued that the utter crushing of the Minnesota Uprising of the Santees had actually ended that "war" for all practical purposes, the wording "War with the Sioux" aparently deliberately blurs the line between the Santees who had launched the ultimately failed uprising and all the other Sioux tribes who lived further west outside white-controlled reservations. In fact, there was no war with these Sioux - until the US army attacked them.

"The Sioux, who had been operating north of Fort Rice, moved across the Missouri River and took a strong position on the Little Missouri River, about 200 miles from the fort."

This wording makes about as much sense as saying "The whites who had been operating in Minnesota took a strong position in New Ulm in late August 1862". In other words, this wording deliberate obfusciates the difference between a community of people pursuing their daily pursuits in a given region of residence on the one hand and a unit of combatants being on a military operation on the other hand. The only connection to anything military these Sioux had was that they had given shelter to Santee refugees from Minnesota - who formed a small minority of the overall group of indians here.

Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Killdeer Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]