Talk:List of road accidents/archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MX[edit]

From the MX, Tuesday April 26, 2005, p.13

Quote: ‹ Contract › A BUS and a freight train collided north of South Africa's capital, killing at least nine people and injuring 60 others, police said.

Police said helicopters were used to fly the most seriously injured to hospitals.

He said the cause of the collision near Johannesburg was still being investigated, but it appears the bus driver did not check to see if there was a train coming before trying to cross the tracks.

5 or more[edit]

It seems to me that about a third of the entries in this section, primarily the most recent ones, relate incidents that most likely are not worth note here. Although these types of incidents are tragic, a fair number of such incidents occurs in any given major city per year. As a rule, let's say that if an incident was significant enough that it could arguably merit an article in it's own right (not to say one needs to exist or be written), it is of enough historical significance for this list. Otherwise, it may be a tragedy but it probably doesn't belong here. Shaggorama 09:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I would say that unless it is the top one or two crashes in that country's histrory, or there was some other cause of notability (e.g. famous person involved) then they should not be here. Wikipedia is not a cellotaph. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These ones seem pretty unremarkable:

The first, second and fifth of those DO have articles about them, and the NZ one claims to be the country's second-worst, so those four probably qualify to stay under the suggested criteria. --Scott Davis Talk 05:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem if they are genuinely notable, they should be linked to the articles obviously. I'm just trying to avoid creep. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 10:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Meath crash caused a serious furore in Ireland re safety on school buses (the rules said 3 pupils to 2 seats, with no seatbelts, was legal), also all the victims were so young, so I think it should be included. EamonnPKeane 16:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buses seem to have gotten very dangerous this autumn. In October 2006 alone 388 people were killed in 16 bus accidents, while in all of 2003 189 people were in killed in 6 accidents (not counting murders) and 258 were killed in all of 2004 in five bus accidents. - BIL 00:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganise[edit]

I propose that this list should be reorganised more along the lines of the List of rail accidents. All small incidents should be removed, either they are not news worthy enough for Wikipedia or the are already covered by List of famous people who died in road accidents. Then it should be arranged by date, withonly those incidents in which more than 20 people died, or with less but which have already merited an article of their own, or which have a very special significance (can't think of an example). What do people think? I'll do it my self in a couple of days if no one seriously objects. --Jackyd101 03:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I reorganised it by date. I felt that researching a list of road accidents by death toll was morbid and unencyclopaedic, whilst by date they have a linear progression and are easy to find. For those who do wish to see the worst road accidents ever, I've set up space at the end for a "top ten" position if people want to use it. I saw lots of things on the list which I didn't think fitted it. There are dozens of car accidents in which multiple people die every day, for this list they need to be exceptional for some reason, or at least have a page of their own elsewhere. I removed the famous poeple from the list because they have their own list, which I linked to. The things I removed I put below. If someone can explain in the entry why they are exceptional, then by all means put them back. I also reinstated those list above which had articles of their own. Hope the new list is more informative, I based it on List of rail accidents, which has been revamped and is much more useful. --Jackyd101 19:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One additional note, here are the items I removed because I didn't think they fitted:

--Jackyd101 19:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC) shouldnt bus bombings be listed under terrorism rather than as traffic accidentsBouse23 13:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Runaway cruft[edit]

Most sources show that the rates of fatality are declining in all developed countries, but there are more in this year's list than for some previous decades. This is supposed to be about historically signficant accidents. Guy 18:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]