Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep moink 07:05, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands

• Delete all micronations. RickK 23:12, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This article needs to be re-written in a NPOV but I see no reason to delete it.MicahMN | Talk 23:14, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. From article: the population of people actually living on the islands is zero Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:22, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and NPOV. This group has gained high-circulation press coverage in Australia; I'm personally aware of three different news reports in recent months. --Gene_poole 23:31, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep this too please Yuckfoo 01:23, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't a "micronation", it's a batch of press releases. --Calton | Talk 01:48, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete micronations and "secessionist" movements that don't actually secede. android↔talk 03:01, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • Then we should delete Quebec sovereignty movement! MicahMN | Talk 14:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Okay, maybe that was overly broad. My point is: people who want Quebec to secede from Canada actually live in Quebec. No one lives on these islands. It's more a publicity stunt than an actual movement, though I am reconsidering my vote based on the press coverage. android↔talk 14:34, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Kevin Rector (talk) 03:43, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Starblind and Calton, etc. Niteowlneils 03:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Another ridiculous micronation. Indrian 05:04, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: joke/promo. Destroy all micronations. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and cleanup. Received press coverage in Australia. Megan1967 08:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep on the basis of high-circulation press coverage. Kappa 11:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Lots of media coverage. EdwinHJ | Talk 13:37, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Provisional keep if someone comes up with their proposed law of succession. -- Smerdis of Tlön 14:09, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. If the keep votes are based on press coverage, could we have some links to press articles? None have been given to verify this. SteveW | Talk 22:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I've just added the 2 most recent media references of which I'm aware, from Australia and the UK. --Gene_poole 02:42, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - good luck to them. - Longhair | Talk 09:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsensical. Radiant_* 09:23, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's more than a 'micronation' article. It documents a political protest pertaining to a very relevant cultural phenomenon: gay marriage.Tobycat 03:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's not a successionist movement, not even a micronation, really. It's more of a political stunt, I agree. But it seems to be a somewhat notable political stunt since I heard about it, outside of WP, over here on the other side of the planet. And we do have articles for notable political stunts. Jonathunder 07:05, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
• Well, I'm inclined to agree that this was a political stunt rather than a real attempt to create a micronation. It also appears to have been a flash in the pan - more appropriate to a newspaper than an encyclopedia. I wish we could transwiki to WikiNews. As it is, I have to vote delete. Rossami (talk) 23:31, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:28, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I see no reason to delete it. Jasenlee 09:27, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.