Tenerife airport disaster was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Use of image of "similar" KLM plane vs image of captain in in-flight magazine[edit]
Twice in recent days, the status quo image in the KLM Flight 4805 sections has been changed to a photo of a "similar" KLM aircraft. First by an IP editor here: [1] and secondly by @Crafty121: here: [2]; both times without an edit summary explaining the change, and Crafty 121 just created an account this week I see. Given that the actual incident aircraft already has images in this article, I fail to see what is to be gained by adding a photo of a different aircraft which was not involved in the accident. Further, the status quo image of Captain Jacob Veldhuyzen Van Zanten seems to me to be far more useful in this section than a photo of an unrelated aircraft since the section provides background about him. After reverting the second editor am bringing this here for discussion lest I fall afoul of WP:3RR. Echoedmyron (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
The final quotations from the recorder of PanAm in the collisions section are not in transcripts of the event on third party websites. When you Google the statements (at least the first page) of results looks like they copy this quotation from Wikipedia. It looks to me like a dramatized/fictional quotation. Can we please find a reliable source for it? Peace and Passion☮("I'm listening....") 01:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Researching back into the history, there was a transcript that morphed over time like a meme, with minor and major changes consistently being made to the transcript. A 'dubious' tag was associated with the section. On May 27, 2007, with no further citation, an editor removed the tag. At one point the captain even included "Oh, Shit!" Please tell me someone's fictional last words haven't been on the Wiki for about 15 years... (and spawned into other later sources). Peace and Passion☮("I'm listening....") 04:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A PBS Nova source (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/planecrash/minutes.html) has the quotation, and they say it is from this (http://www.project-tenerife.com/engels/PDF/Tenerife.pdf) document. Oddly, it is not in that document. It would likely be around page 57 (of the document's printed pagination), but it is not, all that is said is the report writer saying there were "logical exclamations of alarm." Unusually, as well, the "goddamn" quotation is not in the actual transcript-format part of the Nova article, it is in an associated paragraph, while earlier in the article they say the paragraphs not in the transcript itself are "NOVA annotations" (fabrications?). Peace and Passion☮("I'm listening....") 05:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It really surprises me official investigation transcripts would be censored, in any case. Alas, now I'm not sure what to do about it (in the article mainspace, that is). Suggestions? Peace and Passion☮("I'm listening....") 04:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[Note: I just realized that a more thorough transcript is "hidden" collapsed in the article. I had not recognized this at first, hence my apparent confusion above. Nevertheless, it still appears problematic, and the now cited video narrator adds in the swearing, while a redacted transcript is shown on screen. This must be somewhere!] Peace and Passion☮("I'm listening....") 05:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
