Talk:Five-card stud

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Mid-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Missing info on first card dealt[edit]

It's not mentioned in the opening paragraphs, even in the example game with those 4 players, whether or not a player is allowed to look at their first (face-down) card. In the example game, the player who apparently had nothing re-raised the one who was showing a pair of Queens. Presumably she only did this because she knew her face down card was an Ace (after having looked at it). The looking wasn't mentioned though, and I don't know if she was just purely gambling having not been allowed to look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.155.230.199 (talk) 19:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opening comment[edit]

Note: Many of the poker pages were originally placed in the public domain, so their presence on other web sites, etc. does not necessarily indicate a copyright violation. See Talk:List_of_miscellaneous_poker_variants for discussion.

Hi, I added a good 5 card stud strategy page link but I don't think I did it right. If someone happens to read this, could you please fix it if able? Thanks, Nicole

Overview section[edit]

A simple overview, something like the one which can be found on the seven-card stud page, would be very nice in that readers wouldn't be forced to muddle through the long example when seeking just a basic description. I may add such an overview should I find time to do so. --Raoul Duke (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Five-card stud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]