Talk:Lickey

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

removed stub. lickey is so small i don't think you could write any more about it!!

Just wonderng if anyone has any info on The Monument? It's an absolutely huge obelisk (60-80ft approx?) situated behind the trees bordering the old birmingham road directly opposite the petrol station in Lickey. Even though I have lived in the vilage all my life I don't really know what its there for, though what I can remember of the inscription reads "to commend to imitation the exemplary private virtues of Other Archer 6th Earl of Plymouth". Like I say its a pretty huge thing and I don't know what an Earl of Plymouth has to do with Lickey. Cheers!

Thank you for this information. I have added it to the article with a link to Other Windsor, 6th Earl of Plymouth. Biscuittin (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it is not clear why the tone tag has been added. can anyone explain? i see no examples or doublespeak or argot? Leonig Mig (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the description of the picture as the old school house was redeveloped a couple of years ago and the scouts were chucked out. Its now offices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.188.51.2 (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up[edit]

If there was a tone tag on this article, I would be inclined to keep it. However, there are multiple issues so I've addded a genereic 'clean up' tag. The tone is probably not intentionally too familiar but needs a formal touch for an encyclopedia, and:

Rerefences are needed
No mention of the age or notability of the horse trough is provided.
The statements flagged as 'neutrality' look like the author's own impressions, and need either cutting, rephrasing for neutrality, or referencing.
--Kudpung (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]