Talk:University of Washington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on University of Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Compensation for athletic coaches and employees[edit]

I recently added a table of salaries for various athletic coaches to the athletics section.

This table was then removed by user "UWDAWGS" (perhaps a representative of the UW athletic program who thought that the compensation table made the program look bad?).

I am wondering what others think about including salary levels for coaches in this article. When you google "UW football coach" or "UW basketball coach", the first suggested search is "UW football coach salary", so this is clearly information that people are keen to find. Wouldn't it be helpful to have it presented in a convenient table? Or is it more appropriate to incorporate this information into the article text?

UWDAWGS says that the athletic coach compensation is "athletic trivia". But the article already has an exhaustive list of mascots going back 100 years. I would agree that mascot history is far more trivial than athletic coach compensation, which reflects the priorities of the university and has a tangible effect on funding available for other programs.

Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.175.106.210 (talk) 20:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to Talk. This article scope is the 150+ year history of an academic institution. Objections include WP:PROPORTION (the 2018 TE coach salary is not relevant, here), WP:RECENTISM (edit doesn't seem focused on "a long-term, historical view"), and some content is a better match for other articles (where it isn't currently included) such as Washington Huskies and 2018 Washington Huskies football team as was mentioned.[1] UW Dawgs (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Oppose: You could argue that the table could be included on the Washington Huskies page but it's hardly relevant to the University's main page nor is it particularly encyclopedic. As for the list of mascots you mentioned, feel free to discuss that or bold remove them yourself. "Other stuff exists" is not a valid point. Malayy (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)