Talk:Ruth Warrick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I've removed the pictures because I'm almost 100% that they're not usable. Mike H 23:42, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)

Is she really dead? There was a rumor that started from a newsgroup days ago but I haven't seen anything on Google News yet, or in the AP. --JamesB3 00:54, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This story here was on the front page at yahoo.com. Mike H 19:36, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

Age[edit]

She stated that her birth dae was june, 29 1916 in the archive of american television which you can view on google video and youtube. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.214.108 (talk) 15:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

screencap[edit]

I have added a screencap of Ruth Warrick as Phoebe on AMC. I took it today w/ my digital camera from the flashbacks aired at Phoebe's memorial. User:Dowew May 12, 2005.

  • I have added some more screencaps. Pherhaps its too many. [User:Dowew]]
  • That is what I am thinking...we need three at the max....Weatherman90 01:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dame[edit]

I have added Ruth's titles in the start of the article but I have never done a footnote citation before so I dont think its been done correctly.

The information comes from the book listed in References. The Most Venerable Order of St. John of Jerusalem is an order of Knighthood set up during the crusages which now has chapters all over the world - it is the only order of knighthood still applicable to Canadians. Aparently Ruth accepted it from Mikail Gorbachev when she traveled to Moscaw as part of a "global Forum" to speek to him about the world's environmental problems and visited the Kremlin. Dowew 02:22, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Inlovingmemoryofruthwarrickscreencap.JPG[edit]

Image:Inlovingmemoryofruthwarrickscreencap.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olderruthwarrickscreencap.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Olderruthwarrickscreencap.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Warrick[edit]

Appeared in "The Returning" in 1983 Essomeric (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but not an inherently notable credit. Quis separabit? 01:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]