Talk:Caronia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Hm, two pages, with the same subject:Caronia and Canneto di Caronia fires.

Why does it fell under category "paranormal places"??

Merging Canneto di Caronia fires with this article[edit]

I agree with the previous comment. Both articles are short enough to justify merging, and Caronia doesn't belong in the Paranormal Places category unless the information about the fires is included. I'm going to go ahead and merge the articles. --Helfaery 05:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finished merging the articles. I left the tag designating it as a stub, since there is still very little information about Caronia in the article.

I just stumbled across this page which said something like 'An official government report says the fires were caused by aliens' stating ref 11 as the source. I edited that roughly, but maybe there is enough unexplained evidence to class it as a 'Paranormal Place'. What do you say?Bergenblogger (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, a link to Talk: Canneto di Caronia fires. One user noted that the assertion that a water pipe cannot catch fire--"One article also claimed that a water pipe caught fire, though this report seems dubious"--ignores the possibility that the pipe might have been "coated with or surrounded by" a material which could have caught fire. --Helfaery 06:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery's Unexplained Files episode..[edit]

..says the Government intervened and stopped any further investigation into this. The cause was identified to be electromagnetic forces originating from the sea. Weapon testing by US in the sea has been suggested as a possibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.96.145 (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caronia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]