Talk:History of Monaco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WW2[edit]

What happened during WW2? Did Monaco have borders with Italy (which seized the Riviera), Vichy France or occupied France? Did some of belligerant governments threaten with seizing Monaco? Was it a hotspot of espionage? Refugees? Did Monegasque troops fight? In which side?

I was wondering that same thing. It would seem odd that if, when all of France was occupied by the germans after the Normandy invasion, that Hitler would have left little Monaco alone.

Monaco was under Italian, then German occupation. See the article on Prince Louis II.

  • it seems odd to mention that Monaco was not under Grimaldi rule during the French occupation and not to mention that it was not under Grimaldi rule during part of the second world war. --Peterk2 (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Monaco was officially neutral during World War II, although it retained close ties to Vichy France and adopted Vichy's pro-German position. Prince Louis II remained the ruler of Monaco the entire time. Dick Kimball (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the Greek[edit]

Since the name goes to the Greek er, I gather that the fact that the Grimaldis disguised themselves as monks has no actual relation to the name. And hence the coat of arms is not armes parlant.

Fact? The folk etymology, devised for a name that had become mysterious with time, spawned the explanatory myth, as happens all the time with Greek myths that "explain" archaic rites and things... and with many myths in other cultures, I'm sure. --Wetman 01:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Menton and Roquebrune?[edit]

They are listed in main page but not in specialised subpage. Pavel Vozenilek 15:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ligurian language - indo european or not?[edit]

The article says "...the ancient Ligurian language, which was apparently not Indo-European..." Yet the article Ligurian language says "Very little is known about this language... which is generally believed to have been Indo-European..." Well which is it? Herostratus (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rise of the Grimaldis[edit]

The statement that "...the area remained under the control of the Grimaldi family to the present day, except when under French control from 1793 to May 17, 1814." is not correct. As the Wikipedia entry Template:Timeline rulers of Monaco shows, Monaco was under the control of Genoa three times in the fourteenth century and once again in the fifteenth, as well as briefly being occupied by Milan also in the fifteenth century. Dick Kimball (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic extent[edit]

Has the geographic extent ever been larger then its current borders and where would I be able to see this map?70.160.75.159 (talk) 04:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was larger until 1860, but still very small. john k (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rise of the Grimaldis?[edit]

So the whole history of Monaco as a distinct entity is contained in one section of the article? That's silly. john k (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.historyofnations.net/europe/monaco.html
    Triggered by \bhistoryofnations\.net\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Monaco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]