Talk:Widget

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Prevalence[edit]

How common is the term widget sed for window components outside of unix? I speak with limited experience, but I have NEVER heard anyone use it to describe windowing components for mac, windows, java, by a developer of said system. I could really be wrong about mac, but I am squarly confident that windows developers don't. Anyone know more?

Alan D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.207.8.65 (talk) 23:18, 24 May 2002‎ (UTC)[reply]

I have heard the term widget used for (hate to use the word again, but...) widgets on a webpage (slashdot.org to be specific). I believe that i may have also heard it used for Windows also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazzydee (talkcontribs) 21:06, 3 March 2004‎ (UTC)[reply]
On the Mac: sure, even Apple uses this terminology. I have a copy of Cooper's "About Face", where he says "Gizmos, controls, widgets, or agdgets -- whatever you choose to call them..."; he prefers "gizmo", and apparently Microsoft uses "control". I admit it seemed really weird (as a longtime Apple and Unix developer) reading a book that used something other than "widget". I guess maybe it is a Windows-ism to use something other than "widget". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.16.250.66 (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2004‎ (UTC)[reply]

Etymology[edit]

Anyone know who came up with the term widget? I thought it would have been an economist, but the Oxford dictionary has a journalist (I think a journalist) named E. Lyons. Any thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.46.125.17 (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2005‎ (UTC)[reply]

The alt.usage.english FAQ traces it back to a 1924 play; I'll mention both in the article. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:17, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Boddingtons widget[edit]

Last week I had a can of Boddingtons containing a different kind of widget. It's a plastic cylinder (appeared to be about an inch in diameter) stuck to the bottom of the can. How does this sort compare in how it works? And do any other brands have this sort as well? -- Smjg 14:10, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Disambiguation page[edit]

Hi. I suggest that a disambiguation page be created for 'widget', which would be better. The entries, quite obviously, can be written as - 1. Widget_(Device) 2. widget_(Computing) 3. Widget_(Comics) Thank you. Jam2k 10:50, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and it is so done. See Widget (disambiguation). Scott Ritchie 18:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is an actual tool called a widget. I used to use them often in the 1980's. It is sort of a razor blade holder / scraping / cutting tool. I came here looking for a photo of it and was surprised to not find it on the disambigulation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.111.45.231 (talk) 14:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A note[edit]

It might be worth mentioning here that Roald Dahl used the term widget to describe male gremlins in his book The Gremlins back in WWII (females were fifinellas. Anyone looking into the history of the term might mention this. --DanielCD 22:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest new link[edit]

"The Widget" is also the nickname of the Delta Air Lines logo and/or the livery they used (with minor changes) from the 1970's to 1997. I would add the link to Delta myself, but I do not know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.178.89.43 (talk) 00:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There, added including a link to the relevant paragraph in Delta Air Lines. Diego (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Widget template[edit]

Should I/we add the template of the widget engines Template:Widget engine mabdul 0=* 11:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]