Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bash.org (0th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

Bash.org

Webpage vanity

The above is 64.166.84.213, who did not sign.

Keep. Notable enough for me. Euphoria 05:11, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Keep this page! Damn... I can't believe this is being VFD'd!—Trevor Caira 05:14, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Invalid. Anons can't vote on VfD, and they can't nominate for VfD. This is just an attempt at beaurocratic vandalism. Someone needs to remove this nomination. CXI 05:22, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Comment: I don't think there is anything wrong with anons nominating stuff on VfD, there does not seem to be an explicit policy against that (and it's not really a major problem since it does not happen all that often). Anyway, bash.org is definitely notable enough for a keep -- Ferkelparade π 12:47, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Harmless. Someone seems to care. Keep. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:17, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. --Slowking Man 08:20, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep'. But it's not like I think that my vote is necessary. Jeltz 13:07, 2004 Dec 10 (UTC)
• Keep: If there are no valid delete votes in 24 hours, I would recommend early removal from VfD. An obviously significant web leader. Geogre 13:35, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, and support early removal. James F. (talk) 16:02, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Yet another abusive listing, further support early removal from VfD. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 17:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. There is no reason for deletion. -- Judson 19:26, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, for reasons already written. -- Old Right 19:39, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - Its a valid wiki-page. -- Crevaner 19:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, noteworthy website. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 23:13, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - inherenly noteworththy Fledgeling 05:20, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.