Talk:Trigraph (computing)
From WP:RfD:
- Trigraph (computing) -> C_trigraph. Trigraphs are particular to C. I repointed existing pages to the new article; the old page is an orphan. Akihabara 13:42, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Trigraphs are not particular to C, neither are computer trigraphs, neither is the topic of the page, termed a "trigraph sequence", which also occurs in SQL. I fear something is not quite right here. Aliter 16:46, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- C trigraphs (the subject of the new page) are particular to the C family of languages, which is how the link from the disambiguation Trigraph page is labelled. Any other meanings of trigraphs should get new pages linked from the Trigraph disambiguation page. I see little point in keeping the redirects. Akihabara 23:05, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I mixed something up there. I don't think it's supposed to be SQL, but I can't recall what the other use for that type of trigraphs is. It does simplify the discussion, though. In C, this type of trigraph is called a "trigraph sequence", not a "C trigraph". Apparently the link from the disambigation page is less than correct. Creating a redirect from C trigraph to trigraph sequence seems like a good idea, though. Anyway, let's see which pages we can give content rather than just redirects. Aliter 21:44, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- C trigraphs (the subject of the new page) are particular to the C family of languages, which is how the link from the disambiguation Trigraph page is labelled. Any other meanings of trigraphs should get new pages linked from the Trigraph disambiguation page. I see little point in keeping the redirects. Akihabara 23:05, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Helps prevent accidental re-creation, causes no harm. jni 05:59, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Trigraphs are not particular to C, neither are computer trigraphs, neither is the topic of the page, termed a "trigraph sequence", which also occurs in SQL. I fear something is not quite right here. Aliter 16:46, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)