Talk:Gregory Hill (writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

greg hill was most certainly not a pen name for robert anton wilson. my mother married greg when i was five years old, and i met wilson, thornley, benares and others throughout the course of my childhood. greg was a very dear man, i would like to make sure no one is confused about the fact that he and wilson were two separate and distinct people. nmckv@nyc.rr.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.53.34 (talkcontribs)

removed merge request[edit]

Greg Hill appears to be an unwiki'd paste of a resume of an unrelated person named Greg Hill. It shouldn't even be in the wikipedia AFAICT and certainly shouldn't be merged into this page or vice versa. DenisMoskowitz 19:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right. I have put the template in, because I thought it was a text about the same person and didn't read it. -- Amtiss, SNAFU ? 20:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

death[edit]

Social Security Death Index accessed via Rootsweb has a Gregory H. Hill b. 21 May 1941, d. 20 Jul 2000. Schizombie 07:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

with SSN of 566-52-4984, died in California. It all matches up. NTK 12:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rumoured to be?[edit]

The article on Malaclypse the Younger states "The name is most likely a pen name used by Greg Hill". Is Malaclypse's identity speculation or fact? These two articles should synch up either way. --irrevenant [ talk ] 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article should simply redirect to Malaclypse the Younger. — [ aldebaer⁠] 22:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. The two personas are not necessarily related. There are theories that the name was later adopted by a different person. -- 62.143.139.233 (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not real[edit]

Greg Hill is a fictional creation of Robert anton Wilson. There are no RELIABLE sources that he is a real person at all. Rich.lewis (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we're going to ignore you now. DenisMoskowitz (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]