Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cenovis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 15:28, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Cenovis[edit]

Commercial and not notable. Physchim62 14:56, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, and rewrite. It's actually not a specific product, but a brand. It's not a commercial just because it's about a company, and this company (a 150 year old Australian health care company [1]) seems noteworthy. Eixo 23:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Don't know whether the yeast extract is notable but it is not connected with Cenovis who make vitamins and other pharmaceutical products. The yeast extract appears to a Swiss product. The Cenovis company certainly is notable and perhaps the bulk of the article should be about the Australian group with a brief reference to the Swiss reference. Capitalistroadster 00:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rewrite and expand. Cenovis company in Australia is notable. Megan1967 05:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Don't confuse this with Synovus, an MNC medical corp. The article, as written, only says that this is a yeast product. Is a particular yeast extract encyclopedic? IMO, it isn't, if it hasn't changed the product or the world. Geogre 14:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.