Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computers in Postmodernity
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was ambiguous (probably because of the way the former vote was transcluded in). SimonP apparently decided to keep for now. I am attempting to close the discussion. Rossami (talk)
Computers in postmodernity[edit]
Uncleanupable POV, essay, with a constituency that seems intent on spreading it through various catagories. It's a cancer, kill it. Stirling Newberry 19:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't think this has any chance of becoming a valid encyclopedia article. ~leif ☺ HELO 20:32, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Though, actually, I see this is a sneaky (note the uppercase Postmodernity) re-listing, since the article (barely) survived VfD less than two weeks ago. I have transcluded the previous VfD below; perhaps we should just extend it since the majority of delete votes was nearly a consensus. ~leif ☺ HELO 20:52, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- I wasn't here when that vote was taken. Stirling Newberry 21:14, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete essay. Nearly all of the citations are on computers or postmodernity separately, so that the conclusions are essentially the author's. Gazpacho 07:28, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original essay. There is some possibility for an article on this topic, as there have been a number of people that have written about it (which BTW do not appear in the bibliography), but this essay doesn't even do a very good job of summarizing what is said in the sources listed there. older≠wiser 04:12, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.