Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Light Rail (KCRC)

Light Rail (KCRC)

I hereby put this article to the candidates for the featured article. You may discuss the points. --219.77.53.79 07:08, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Object, no references and no mention of number of travelers who use these tracks. Mgm|^(talk) 08:43, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Object because a) the lead section is way too short when you consider the length of the following sections; b) as this is the English language wikipedia, the system map in whatever language that is really doesn't help very much, the map shown in the English Wikipedia should be translated into English (is there a system map that shows the routes' locations in a more geographically accurate manner?); c) the list of stations could be greatly simplified to remove the table as almost all of the stations for each branch of the system has basically the same information (as it is, the table is a large blob in the middle of the article) slambo 21:24, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Object. I really thank you for giving me permission to discuss it. Too many red links, and I really don't like the colored fonts used. RickK 22:17, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Object. The rainbow fonts are hard to read and go against what is in WP:MOS. The article is way overlinked (e.g. every occurrence of Tuen Mun is wikilinked). The table and the map run into each other at low resolutions. The article could probably use a spelling/grammar check (for example, I found an "especialy" in the first paragraph). JYolkowski 00:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Object. Main image is unsourced and possible copyright violation. —Steven G. Johnson 04:28, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Object. Same grounds as Slambo, RickK. Agreeing with JYolkowski except for the rainbow fonts part. Stevenj is also probably right regarding the copyright of the image. I have some KCRC picture that I took awhile ago that I could upload, but I'd rather work on the MTR article first. --JuntungWu 12:57, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)