Talk:Ovidie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article looks more like a fan page than an encyclopedia article: content is indeed overwhelmingly positive, unsourced and does not explain why this person is important enough to appear on Wikipedia. This violates Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons : Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space. 82.233.123.121 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pretty POV article, overwhelmingly positive and not neutral at all, needs refinement. -CunningLinguist 07:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Important enough to appear on Wikipedia?" The standard is not "important enough." It is inherent scholarly interest. As sexology is an academic discipline, and the casts, production and content of adult films are a significant part of the discipline, actors as prominent as the subject of this article definitely qualify as being "significant enough" to apear on Wikipedia.Coloneldoctor (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the Colonel and think he is a genius of unparalleled stature. Whatever happened to you, anyway? The world is growing stupid without your input. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.137.178 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with the Colonel, and wonder what ever happened to him. I'm not sure Wikipedia is grand enough to earn his favor anyway. Long live the Colonel Doctor! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.156.164 (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ovidie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

official name[edit]

refused to give her real name to the press Is that so relevant that it has to be the first sentence, given that apparently she changed her mind about it? Or would she prefer to remain pseudonymous but has been doxed? --188.101.94.74 (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]