Talk:Scientific consensus on global warming

This article seems to cover identical groud to Scientific opinion on climate change. Is there any reason to have this article? --Axon 12:56, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

(William M. Connolley 13:56, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)) Probably not. I've hacked it anyway, but can't really see the point in re-opening the same arguments on yet another page.

(William M. Connolley 21:05, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)) And on review I made it a redirect as Axon suggested.

It doesn't seem to be redirecting any more, it comes up if that title is searched for. Sln3412 22:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blame Ed. I've speedied it William M. Connolley 21:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Who deserves the credit? Who deserves the blame? Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevskii is his name!" (with apologies to Tom Lehrer)

You see, William, I've been saying all along that there no Scientific consensus on global warming! ;-) --Uncle Ed 18:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:-) William M. Connolley 19:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol !!!!! -- btw I put in a redirect on it. ;^) Sln3412 20:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repointing this page[edit]

Repoint[edit]

It is proposed to repoint the page to Climate change consensus shortly. Please record any concerns with proceeding. Thanks. ‒ Jaymax✍ 10:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. --GoRight (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did this on the 15th; I disagreed; nothong has changed since then. Why does this page even exist? It is an unlikely misspelling William M. Connolley (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]